<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ex Machina &#187; emailmarketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/tag/emailmarketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina</link>
	<description>Social Media, Mobile &#38; Blogs for Small &#38; Mid-size Organizations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Amusing e-mail preference center UX fail</title>
		<link>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2010/08/12/amusing-e-mail-preference-center-ux-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2010/08/12/amusing-e-mail-preference-center-ux-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-mail marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emailmarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanoutfitters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been doing a tour de e-mail preference centers the last few days. I just returned from a seven week leave from my job, and I’m unsubbing from a lot of lists I’d put myself on for research purposes in an effort to clean up my e-mail.
I came across this amusing mistake from Urban Outfitters.

The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been doing a tour de e-mail preference centers the last few days. I just returned from a seven week leave from my job, and I’m unsubbing from a lot of lists I’d put myself on for research purposes in an effort to clean up my e-mail.</p>
<p>I came across this amusing mistake from Urban Outfitters.</p>
<p><a href="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Screen-shot-2010-08-12-at-11.53.29-AM.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-177" title="Screen shot 2010-08-12 at 11.53.29 AM" src="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Screen-shot-2010-08-12-at-11.53.29-AM.png" alt="" width="400" height="386" /></a></p>
<p>The site doesn’t recognize me, so it flashes up a SUBSCRIBE TO E-MAIL pop-up&#8230; On the e-mail unsubscribe page!</p>
<p>Oops. Don&#8217;t do this on your site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2010/08/12/amusing-e-mail-preference-center-ux-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Add a &#8220;Share on Facebook&#8221; button to your marketing e-mails</title>
		<link>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2009/10/08/add-a-share-on-facebook-button-to-your-marketing-e-mails/</link>
		<comments>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2009/10/08/add-a-share-on-facebook-button-to-your-marketing-e-mails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-mail marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emailmarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialmedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: The tutorial below worked like a dream in 2009, but your mileage may vary now. I&#8217;m no longer in a role where I&#8217;m directly supporting Facebook for my company, so you may want to look elsewhere, as I&#8217;m no longer updating this information.
Cheetahmail demonstrated some of their new social media integration features during September&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Update: The tutorial below worked like a dream in 2009, but your mileage may vary now. I&#8217;m no longer in a role where I&#8217;m directly supporting Facebook for my company, so you may want to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drADcEi0GSg">look elsewhere</a>, as I&#8217;m no longer updating this information.</em></strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-57" title="facebook" src="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/facebook.png" alt="facebook" width="50" height="50" />Cheetahmail demonstrated some of their new social media integration features during September&#8217;s <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Experian-CheetahMail/11779097959">Relevance Tour</a> stop in Boston. I didn&#8217;t feel like waiting for them to roll out the functionality on our account, so I took apart an <a href="http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/" target="_blank">Urban Outfitters</a> e-mail to see how it was done. (Their e-mail campaigns are great, by the way). The result is this quick how-to.</p>
<p>First of all, let&#8217;s look at the results. I now have an e-mail offer with a &#8220;Share on Facebook&#8221; button. When a user clicks the button, they&#8217;re taken to Facebook&#8217;s <strong>Post to Profile</strong> page:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-87" title="howtofbshare1" src="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/howtofbshare1-300x155.png" alt="howtofbshare1" width="390" height="200" /></p>
<p>The user can make their own comment and edit the link text as they wish. Once they click Share, a link to a hosted version of the e-mail, complete with thumbnail, shows up on their wall.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-88" title="howtofbshare2" src="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/howtofbshare2-300x253.png" alt="howtofbshare2" width="300" height="253" /></p>
<p>More importantly, it shows up in their friends&#8217; feeds. Prior to implementing the Share button, I had a button that sent users to our Facebook fan page. The Share button is a much more powerful way for e-mail marketers to use Facebook, as it drives traffic to your own hosted e-mail offer, rather than to Facebook itself.</p>
<p><strong>On to the How-to, then…</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Create a hosted version of the e-mail.</strong><br />
Normally, I wouldn&#8217;t have to do this. I use Cheetahmail, which automatically creates hosted versions of my e-mails for me. In this case, though, I &#8216;m going to need to alter the code of the hosted version in step 3, so I&#8217;ll host the HTML on my own site.<br />
Some bulk e-mail services host images for you and convert the <em>src</em> attributes in your &lt;IMG&gt; tags to point to those hosted images. In this case, I recommend using this converted source to make your hosted e-mail, as hits to the images hosted by your e-mail provider are usually used in reporting. This also avoids potentially skewing the analytics on your own web site.</li>
<li><strong>Create a thumbnail for the Facebook wall.</strong><br />
The thumbnail should be 150 pixels wide. It can be either a thumbnail of the e-mail itself, or a smaller treatment using elements picked up from the e-mail. You can skip including a thumbnail, but wall posts with no images lose a lot of impact. In my example, I&#8217;m using a thumbnail of the cover for an electronic catalog we&#8217;re plugging in the e-mail.</li>
<li><strong>Add meta information used by Facebook to the &lt;HEAD&gt; of the hosted e-mail.</strong><br />
When you submit a URL to Facebook&#8217;s Share function, it parses the document and picks up some info from the &lt;HEAD&gt; of the HTML. It uses what it finds as the default text shown on the share screen, enabling you to control what appears there. Facebook looks for a few &lt;META&gt; tags to fill in the copy and a &lt;LINK&gt; tag for the thumbnail image. Take another look at th <strong>Post to Profile</strong> screen shot above. The code that produced that default text looks like this:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92" title="howtofbshare3" src="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/howtofbshare3.png" alt="howtofbshare3" width="389" height="94" /></li>
<li><strong>URL encode the URL of the hosted e-mail.<br />
</strong>Eric Meyer&#8217;s <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/dencoder/" target="_blank">URL Decoder/Encoder</a> is a fast way to do this.</li>
<li><strong>Append the encoded URL to the Facebook share URL as a query string.</strong><br />
Your final URL will look something like this:<br />
<code>http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fyour.hosted.emailserver.com%2Fhostedemail%2FEP283_hosted.html<br />
</code></li>
<li><strong>Create a Share on Facebook button.<br />
</strong>How this button looks and where it&#8217;s positioned in the e-mail will vary a lot depending upon how you do your creative. Generally, though, I think putting it in the center column of the e-mail together with any other social media links you want to include works best. My organization normally puts it in the sidebar, but our creative is atypical of how most companies do marketing e-mails.</li>
<li><strong>Link this button to your Facebook share URL.<br />
</strong>Voilà! You now have a Facebook share button in your e-mail offer.<br />
There is one thing to be cautious of on this step, however: some bulk e-mail services might undo the URL encoding you applied to your query string in steps 4 &amp; 5. Cheetahmail definitely does; I haven&#8217;t tested it on other e-mail providers yet. Be aware of this issue, as it can lead to broken links. Most bulk e-mailers give you the option to  edit the links after they create redirects, so you should be able to fix this manually.</li>
</ol>
<p>Happy sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2009/10/08/add-a-share-on-facebook-button-to-your-marketing-e-mails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report on Cheetahmail Relevance Tour</title>
		<link>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2009/09/28/report-on-cheetahmail-relevance-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2009/09/28/report-on-cheetahmail-relevance-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-mail marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheetahmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emailmarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to Cheetahmail’s “Relevance Tour” client summit the Tuesday before last. This post is a summary of what I saw and heard.

This was the first year they’d done the event in Boston, but it left me wishing I’d attended previous years’ events in NYC. The companies present covered a broad swath, including ad firms, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-77" title="e" src="http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/e-150x150.jpg" alt="e" width="150" height="150" /><span style=""><span style="">I went to Cheetahmail’s “Relevance Tour” client summit the Tuesday before last. This post is a summary of what I saw and heard.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style=""><span style="">This was the first year they’d done the event in Boston, but it left me wishing I’d attended previous years’ events in NYC. The companies present covered a broad swath, including ad firms, retailers, and one other travel company. I think I was the only person there who was the sole representative of their company.</p>
<p>Most of the presentation revolved around best practices and was given by two people from Cheetahmail’s client services group. At the end, they held a panel with Q&amp;A that included their creative director and a few people involved in strategic services. The presentation was broken down into several broad topic areas, including:<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Acquisition (including eAppends) </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Retention </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Testing </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Segmentation </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Reactivation </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Miscellaneous Topics<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Acquisition<br />
</strong>Here are some techniques that Cheetahmail&#8217;s clients are using:<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Acquisition pop-ups for new site visitors. </strong>J. Crew and a few other retailers are using an acquisition pop-up to solicit e-mails from all new site visitors. “New” in this case is defined as un-cookied. Once someone visits, they’re cookied and will no longer see the pop-up, whether they choose to fill out the form or not. In terms of the mechanics, one should do this with a CSS overlay rather than an actual pop-up to avoid pop-up blockers. This is potentially a very powerful lead gathering technique. However, I would be somewhat concerned from a user experience standpoint that it would confuse or annoy past site visitors whose cookies expire or who access the site from a different browser. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">As an alternative to pop-ups, some sites use a <strong>customized ad banner with lead acquisition call to action </strong>for new visitors. (Returning visitors instead see a promo or other information). </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Pop-unders for abandoning users. </strong>Some sites attempt to create a pop-up underneath the user’s current browser window if it looks like they’ve abandoned a form. The pop-under is then present when the user closes the front browser window, providing another chance to grab their eyes. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Automatic opt-in.</strong> Automatically opting in anyone who buys from us is CAN-SPAM compliant, provided they haven’t previously opted out. Whether it&#8217;s a good idea to do this without getting permission is another policy; it depends on how aggressive your organization is. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Required fields. </strong>Make e-mail fields required in all forms; customers now expect this.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style=""><span style=""><strong>eAppends<br />
</strong>Although eAppends are CAN-SPAM compliant, data suggests that users don’t like being appended. Big surprise. For most of Cheetahmail’s clients, names added to their list via eAppends performed only 50% as well as organic leads. Cheetahmail recommends doing eAppends only once every six months, or quarterly if volume is high enough, but eAppending more frequently doesn’t appear to affect performance.</span><span style=""> Most of the discussion on best practices for eAppends had to do with keeping the new user from immediately opting out or hitting their spam button. They recommend doing a series of welcome messages rather than immediately hitting eAppends with promotional mailings. A typical campaign might consist of three or even four mailings: a welcome message (also serving as an opportunity for users to opt-out), an informational mailing about the company, a survey or qualification e-mail, and then maybe an attractive offer.</span></span></p>
<p><span style=""><span style="">For what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;ve never thought eAppends were a good idea, and a lot of people who blog about e-mail marketing  would agree with me. True opt-in is the way to go, in my opinion.</p>
<p><strong>Retention<br />
</strong></span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style="">There was a discussion of <strong>e-mail preference centers</strong>. We were shown a very creative example from Barneys, and while Barneys’ cheeky ad copy wouldn’t fly well with my company&#8217;s septuagenarian demographic, the structure of the page was something any business could duplicate. A good preference center should have the following elements, and in most cases they should appear in this order:<br />
</span></span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Frequency controls. </strong>Promising users to mail them less is the first line of defense against them unsubscribing outright. This has to be implemented in such a way that users actually do get noticeably less mail, or they might just hit their spam button next time. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Unsubscribe button. </strong></span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Change of e-mail address. </strong></span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Receive all/increase frequency. </strong>Barneys’ page calls this the “Please Stalk Me” button. Barneys has implemented this so that users who choose this option receive all of their promotional e-mails.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Unsubscribe surveys</strong> have been used successfully by some companies to gather data on why people leave their lists. One jewelry retailer found that about 15% of people who unsubscribed responded.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Testing<br />
</strong>The best practice here is to realize that different things will work in different situations. Therefore, test frequently, and test a variety of different properties of the mailing. Some things to try include:<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Subject line testing. </strong>This is a very common test. The most common metric to watch is open rate, but some clients found that subject lines affected clickthroughs, too. Test results can be surprising in some cases. Some examples:<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>General subject lines versus sweepstakes. </strong>For survey &amp; qualification e-mails, some clients found that a more general subject line worked better than one that called out a sweepstakes or prizes. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Recognizable names versus general branding.</strong> Companies who had athletic endorsements or other recognizable names sometimes found that using those names in subject lines worked well, although this wasn&#8217;t the case 100% of the time.<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Length (short versus long). </strong>One company found that subject lines of 25 characters or less performed best, subject lines of 50 characters or more were second best, and mid-length subject lines (25-50 characters) were worst. Cheetahmail speculated that this might be because the shortest subject lines leave a noticeable white space in the recipient’s inbox, while long subjects lines might generate curiosity because they get cut off at the end.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Time of day testing. </strong>Strategy people on their panel suggested re-testing time of day and day of week every six months, as the optimal times can change, as well as retesting seasonally. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Hosted link versus no hosted link. </strong>Some companies found that putting a link to a hosted version of the e-mail drew a lot of clicks. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Mobile-friendly hosted links.</strong> In some cases links to mobile-friendly versions of e-mails performed very well.<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Creative Testing.</strong> Can be based around most-clicked links (i.e., where calls to action or other links are located in layout). Should be done across multiple mailings for a valid sample. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Remail campaigns.</strong> Test lift gained from remailing a campaign within a few days of the initial mailing.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Segmentation<br />
</strong></span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Polling. </strong>This is a novel strategy some companies have tried in place of traditional qualification surveys. Rather than trying to get people to fill out an entire survey, set up a poll with results visible to users (e.g., “Where is your favorite destination to travel? &#8230; A) Holland &amp; Belgium, B) Southern Africa, etc.). Then record responses to user records. This demands much less of the user than filling out a whole survey but can still yield useful data.<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Geographic Targeting.</strong> Some companies have tested segmenting by users’ geographical locations. This works particularly well for retailers selling things like sporting goods that might be useful in one part of the country but not another.<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Browser Data</strong>. With site-wide login and cookieing, it becomes possible to track what a user is looking at on the web site and then use this to segment. Cheetahmail clients who took this approach of tying segmentation to web site usage saw very good performance — as much as a 50% lift.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Lifecycle Triggers<br />
</strong>Many of the practices here tied in to how users interact with company web sites.<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Remarketing to shopping cart or form abandoners.</strong> If someone gets part way through filling out a form or ordering online and then abandons, a campaign is triggered. Staples did an automated cart abandonment program that would send users who browsed a product and then abandoned before completing the order a promo for that product and three similar products. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Web site reactivation.</strong> Campaigns can attempt to target web site visitors who looked around a lot but then don’t come back for 30-1000 days. For the really long-lapsed visitors, some companies tried unusual or creative subject lines to grab attention, figuring they had nothing to lose. (One company send mails with a subject line about marauding aliens attacking the Earth and apparently saw some good results!).<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Miscellaneous Topics<br />
</strong></span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Some companies actively solicit reviews and/or testimonials from customers. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Video</strong>. Messages can contain a static video frame that opens a video, or an anigif taken from frames of an actual video. (Holland America uses a product called LiveClicker to do this). </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style=""><strong>Go green</strong> strategies can convert more offline users from paper mail to e-mail/web.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Thought Leaders</strong></p>
<p><span style=""><span style=""> Based on what I saw, watching how the following companies handle certain aspects of e-mail marketing might reveal some good ideas:<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Bass Pro Shops &amp; Giant Eagle — for eAppend welcomes (although this would be very difficult to monitor from outside). </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Drugstore.com — for early lifecycle and synchronization of e-mail content with the company web site. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Barneys — for preference centers. </span></span></li>
<li><span style=""><span style="">Puma &amp; Urban Outfitters — for lead acquisition techniques. I also love Urban Outfitters&#8217; welcome campaign.<br />
</span></span></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackgraham.net/exmachina/2009/09/28/report-on-cheetahmail-relevance-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

